Correlation between Weather Conditions with Tenera Oil Palm Yield in Surat Thani Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
Relationship of weather conditions with Tenera oil palm yield in Surat Thani province. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of climatic factors on oil palm yield in Surat Thani province. The trail period spanned from 2014 to 2021. Climate parameters were recorded over eight years (2014-2021), while bunch yield data were available for six years (2016-2021). The correlation between these variables was analyzed. The results indicate that the environmental conditions in the study area are suitable for oil palm cultivation, with an average annual rainfall of 1,800.54 mm, 158 rainy days per year, a relative humidity of 83.34%, and an average temperature of 27.29°C. Rainfall, the high over than 200 mm per month was October, November, and December about 248.93, 256.10, and 316.96 mm/year, respectively, while February to April was less 100 mm per month. Oil palm production average six years (2016-2021) results showed that the average fresh fruit bunch (FFB) yield was 261.01 kg/palm/year, the number of bunches (BNO) was 13.87 bunches/palm/year, and the average bunch weight (ABW) was 19.69 kg/bunch. Peak yield occurred in September, reaching 36.19 kg/palm, while the lowest yield of 14.14 kg/palm was observed in February. Additionally, it was found that rainfall and minimum temperatures from two years prior to harvesting moderately influenced oil palm yields. Specifically, rainfall and rainy-day parameters positively impacted the production of fresh fruit bunches. Therefore, it is recommended that oil palm farmers utilize historical data on rainfall parameters to forecast plantation management effectively, ensuring consistent oil palm production despite changing climate conditions.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
กรมอุตุนิยมวิทยา. (2564). บริการข้อมูลการตรวจวัดและสถิติอุตุนิยมวิทยา. 20 มกราคม 2563, เข้าถึงได้จาก : https://www.tmd.go.th/service/tmdData.
สถาบันวิจัยพืชไร่. (2554). การจัดการสวนปาล์มน้ำมันเพื่อเพิ่มผลผลิตน้ำมันปาล์ม. กรุงเทพ : กรมวิชาการเกษตร กระทรวงเกษตรและสหกรณ์.
สุรกิตติ ศรีกุล. (2547). เอกสารวิชาการปาล์มน้ำมัน. สุราษฎร์ธานี : กรมวิชาการเกษตร.
สำนักงานเศรษฐกิจการเกษตร. (2564). สถานการณ์สินค้าเกษตรที่สำคัญและแนวโน้ม ปี 2565. กรุงเทพ : สำนักงานเศรษฐกิจการเกษตร กระทรวงเกษตรและสหกรณ์.
สำนักงานเศรษฐกิจการเกษตร. (2566). สถิติการเกษตรของประเทศไทย ปี 2566. กรุงเทพ : สำนักงานเศรษฐกิจการเกษตร กระทรวงเกษตรและสหกรณ์.
Carr, M.K.V. (2011). The water relations and irrigation requirements of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) : a review. Experimental Agriculture, 47 : 629-652.
Chow, C.S. (1992). The effects of season, rainfall and cycle on oil palm yield in Malaysia. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 4 : 32-43.
Corley, R.H.V. and Tinker, P.B. (2016). The Oil Palm Fifth Edition. UK : Wiley Blackwell.
Department of Standards Malaysia. (2005). Malaysian standard MS 157 : 2005 oil palm seed for commercial planting specification (Third revision). Malaysia : Department of Standard Malaysia.
Goh, K.J. (2000). Climatic requirements of the oil palm for high yields. In Managing Oil Palm for High Yield : Agronomic Principles. Kuala
Lumper. (p 1-17). Malaysian Society of Soil Science and Param Agricultural Surveys.
Goh, K.J., Chiu, S.B. and Paramananthan, S. (2018). Agronomic Principles and Practices of Oil Palm Cultivation. Malaysia : Agricultural Crop Trust (ACT).
R Core Team. (2020). R : A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved March 3, 2021, from https://www.r-project.org.
Ramli, A. (2012). An analysis of crude palm oil production in Malaysia. Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal, 12(2) : 36-43.
Sarkar, M.S.K., Rawshan, A.B. and Joy, J.P. (2020). Impact of climate change on oil palm production in Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27 : 9760-9770.
Woittiez, L., Mark, T. van W., Maja, S., Meine, van N. and Ken, E.G. (2016). Yield gaps in oil palm : a quantitative review of contributing factors. European Journal of Agronomy, 83 : 57-77