Dynamic Response Analysis of a Strain Gauge Load Cell under Impact Loading for Accuracy Improvement in an Automatic Bottle Sorting System

Authors

  • Sawanee Jansawang Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9438-0359
  • Anuwat Saenpong Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4444-1057
  • Aphichon Mungchu Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0377-3895
  • Chailai Sasen Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Technology https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8003-006X

Keywords:

Load Cell, Dynamic Response, Settling Time, Automatic Sorting System, Impact Measurement

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the dynamic response behavior of a strain gauge load cell under impact conditions and to apply the findings to improve the accuracy of an automatic sorting system. The experimental setup employed a load cell integrated with an HX711 signal amplification module and an Arduino Uno microcontroller for real-time data acquisition. Experiments were conducted by dropping objects with masses of 30, 50, 120, and 250 grams under controlled position and height conditions. The results showed that the output signal exhibited damped oscillation behavior during the transient period, and the settling time (Ts) increased significantly with the mass of the object. The average settling times for 30, 50, 120, and 250 grams were 50.22, 65.14, 100.02, and 145.03 milliseconds, respectively. To prevent signal overlapping in continuous measurements, the minimum release time was defined as approximately 2Ts, which improved system stability and reduced measurement errors. Furthermore, a linear relationship between object mass and release time was observed, leading to the development of an empirical calibration equation Trelease = 0.832M+86.46 with a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.982, indicating a high level of model accuracy. The findings demonstrate that the dynamic response characteristics of the load cell can be effectively utilized to determine optimal timing in automatic sorting systems, thereby reducing noise effects and signal overlap while enhancing overall system accuracy and stability.

References

[1] Avia Semiconductor, “HX711 24-bit analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for weigh scales,” datasheet, ver. 2.0. [Online]. Available: https://cdn.sparkfun.com/datasheets/Sensors/ForceFlex/hx711_english.pdf

[2] M. N. Annisa, F. N. Fadilla, M. Luthfi, S. Hidayat, and C. A. Rosalia, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Load Cell untuk Pengujian Beban Tekan Berbasis Arduino,” in Proc. 16th Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar (IRWNS), Bandung, Indonesia, Jul. 2025, pp. 303–309, doi: 10.35313/irwns.v16i1.6676.

[3] O. S. Al-Dahiree et al., “Design and Shape Optimization of Strain Gauge Load Cell for Axial Force Measurement for Test Benches,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 19, Art. no. 7508, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22197508.

[4] G. I. Zarate Garnica, E. O. L. Lantsoght, and Y. Yang, “Monitoring structural responses during load testing of reinforced concrete bridges: a review,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 18, no. 10–11, pp. 1558–1580, 2022, doi: 10.1080/15732479.2022.2063906.

[5] C. T. Noh et al., “Measurement of Force and Position Using a Cantilever Beam and Multiple Strain Gauges: Sensing Principles and Design Considerations,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 21, Art. no. 6561, 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25216561.

[6] M. Tiboni, R. Bussola, F. Aggogeri, and C. Amici, “Experimental and Model-Based Study of the Vibrations in the Load Cell Response of Automatic Weight Fillers,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 6, Art. no. 995, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/electronics9060995.

[7] L. Xiong, T. Zhang, A. Yuan, and Z. Zhang, “Research on Filtering Algorithm of Vehicle Dynamic Weighing Signal,” World Electr. Veh. J., vol. 15, no. 6, Art. no. 254, 2024, doi: 10.3390/wevj15060254.

[8] J. Gajda, R. Sroka, P. Burnos, and M. Daniol, “Long-Term Assessment of the Properties of Load Sensors Applied in Weigh-in-Motion Systems,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 8, Art. no. 2421, 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25082421.

[9] PCB Load & Torque Division, Load Cell Handbook: A Technical Overview and Selection Guide, Farmington Hills, MI, USA: PCB Piezotronics, 2023.

[10] Tokyo Measuring Instruments Laboratory Co., Ltd., “TML Transducers 2025–2026: Load Cells, Displacement Transducers, Pressure Transducers, Acceleration Transducers, Product Catalog, Version 2,” [Online]. Available: https://tml.jp/eng/documents/Catalog/transducers2025-2026.pdf. [Accessed: July 2026].

[11] G. Guo et al., “Effect of Additional Mass on Natural Frequencies of Weight-Sensing Structures,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 17, Art. no. 7585, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23177585.

[12] R. Ouyang and R. D. Howe, “Low-Cost Fiducial-based 6-Axis Force-Torque Sensor,” in Proc. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2020, pp. 1653–1659, doi: 10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196925.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-25

How to Cite

[1]
S. Jansawang, A. Saenpong, A. Mungchu, and C. Sasen, “Dynamic Response Analysis of a Strain Gauge Load Cell under Impact Loading for Accuracy Improvement in an Automatic Bottle Sorting System”, JEIT, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 65–77, Aug. 2026.