Specific Cutting Energies for Various Parts of Cassava Plants Obtained from the Pendulum Principle Adapted with Bi-Axial Cutting Force Measuring Device

Main Article Content

Yongyuth Siangdang
Jantana Suntudprom
Payungsak Junyusen
Thayawee Nuboon

Abstract

Cassava is a versatile plant due to all parts of this plant from top to root could be used for a number of purposes, particularly, cassava root. Cassava harvesting processes are involved some steps such as top and stem cutting, cassava tuber cutting, specimen collecting and size reduction of tuber for processing. Generally, cutting is used in several stages of the cassava harvesting process. This research was aimed to evaluate the dynamic force for further development of the suitable equipment for cassava farm. The pendulum 2-Axis cutting force principle for cassava cutting process was constructed and consisted of 4 parts: frame, cutting force measurement, cutting energy measurement, and data processing system. The cutting process was done at 3 different cutting angles of 15, 30 and 45 degrees. The results revealed that, when considering the lowest specific cutting energy, the suitable cutting angle for the top part of cassava stem, cassava tuber peduncle, and cassava tuber was 30 degree, specific cutting energies of 3.72, 5.46, and 0.35 joulespersquarecentimeter, respectively, were used. Whereas, cutting the cassava peduncle could be done at cutting angle of 45 degree, uses a specific cutting energy of 7.54 joules per squarecentimeter. It was clearly observed that cutting the end of cassava stem base which is the hardest part was taken the maximum specific cutting energy and specific maximum cutting force. On the other hand, the top end of cassava stem is consisted of soft tissue therefore the cutting was applied at the lowest specific cutting energy and specific maximum cutting force. To conclude, the pendulum principle cutting could measure the cutting energy and cutting force for cassava cutting process, including for assessment of the other agricultural product cutting force and cutting energy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Siangdang, Y., Suntudprom, J., Junyusen, P., & Nuboon, T. (2026). Specific Cutting Energies for Various Parts of Cassava Plants Obtained from the Pendulum Principle Adapted with Bi-Axial Cutting Force Measuring Device. Journal of Advanced Development in Engineering and Science, 15(44), 94–108. retrieved from https://ph03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pitjournal/article/view/3729
Section
Research Article

References

Office of Agricultural Economics. (2024). Weekly Report of Thai Production and Market for Agricultures. Available From https://www.oae.go.th./assets/portals/1/fileups/ prcaidata/files/cacava%2065.pdf. Accessed date: 27 March 2024. (in Thai)

Suwannapa, K. & Wongpichet, S. (2015). Study of the Engineering Technical Feasibility of Using a Square-Shaped Blade for Chopping and Separating Cassava Roots from Rhizomes. In 16th National Agricultural Engineering Association of Thailand Academic Conference 2015 and 8th International Conference (p. 335-342), 17-19 March 2015, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)

Suwannapa, K. & Wongphichet, S. (2019). Research and Development to Increase the Work Rate of the Cassava Rhizome Chopper. Journal of Science and Technology Research Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. 18(2), 41-51. (in Thai)

Langkapin, C., et al. (2012). Design and Construction of a Machine for Removing Cassava Roots from Rhizomes, Journal of Agriculture. 30(3), 300-311. (in Thai)

Chulayusen, P., et al. (2014). Development of a Cassava Harvesting Machine that Cuts Cassava Tubers from the Rhizomes. Journal of Agriculture. 45(3), 353-356.(in Thai)

Asawang, S., et al. (2016). Design and Develop a Cassava Root De-Peeling Machine. Agricultural Science Journal, 47(3), 463-466. (in Thai)

Wongpichet, S. (2013). Study of the Physical Properties of Cassava Rhizomes and Design of the Working Principle of the Rhizome Cutting Mechanism. Khon Kaen: Post-Harvest Technology Innovation Center, Khon Kaen University. (in Thai)

Langkapin, C., et al. (2008). Development of a Cassava Cutting Machine. Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi Journal of Engineering, 12(1), 19-26. (in Thai)

Bhavaree, N. & Pukaphak, S. (2020). Effects of Rotational Speed on Increasing the Production Rate of Cassava Cutting Machines. Journal of Science and Technology Mahasarakham Rajabhat University, 5(2), 1-13. (in Thai)

Kutsamrong, R. & Klajing, W. (2015). Study of Mechanical Properties of Cassava Plants, In 16th National Agricultural Engineering Association of Thailand Academic Conference 2015 and 8th International Conference (p. 571-577), 17-19 March 2015, Bangkok, Thailand. (in Thai)

Sukprasert, S., et al. (2017). Study and Development of Scotch Yoke Mechanism for Planting Machines Cassava. Journal of Science and Technology Research Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, 10(1), 94-105. (in Thai)

Sompong, C., et al. (2022). Cassava Chopping Machine for Small Farmers. Available from www.technologychaoban.com/agricultural-technology/article_25937. Accessed date: 27 March 2024. (in Thai)

Wangkhueanklang, W. (2004). Study of a Rocking Blade Cassava Chopper for Producing Cassava Pieces, (Master thesis, Khon Kaen University). (in Thai)

Suebkha, S., et al. (2012). Comparison of Energy Used in Cutting Cassava Roots (Research Report). Khon Kaen: Post-Harvest Technology Innovation Center, Khon Kaen University. (in Thai)

Lomchangkum, C., et al. (2020). A Study on the Mechanical Characteristics of Casava Tuber Cutter. International Journal of Agricultural Technology. 16(1), 63-76.(in Thai)

Jyoti, B. (2021). Specific Cutting Energy Characteristics of Casava Stem with Varying Blade Parameters Using Impact Type Pendulum Testing. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Affrica and Latin America, 52(4), 15-23.

Visvanathan, R., et al. (1996). Effect of Knife Angle and Velocity on the Energy Required to Cut Cassava Tubers. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 64(2), 99–102.

Lomchangkum, C., et al. (2020). A Study on the Mechanical Characteristics of Cassava Tuber Cutter. International Journal of Agricultural Technology. 16(1), 63-76.