The Effect of Welding Current and Welding Speed on Hardness and Structure of Lap Joint Between SS400 Steel and SUS304 Stainless Steel in Robotic Gas Metal Arc Welding Process

Main Article Content

Weerapol Taptimdee
Narongsak Thammachot
Peeradaech Suwittayaruk
Atthakorn Chanchana
Amornsak Mayai

Abstract

The objective of this research was to investigate the influence of welding current and welding speed on the hardness, macrostructure, and microstructure of lap joints between SUS304 stainless steel and SS400 carbon steel. Using a robotic Gas Metal Arc Welding process in a vertical-down position, the research utilized an ER309L filler wire with 100% argon shielding gas. Welding parameters included three current levels (120, 140, and 160 A) and three welding speeds (200, 250, and 300 mm/min). The results indicated that increasing the welding current increased the weld bead's width, height, and penetration. Conversely, these properties decreased with an increase in welding speed. A maximum weld bead hardness was achieved at a current of 140 A and a speed of 250 mm/min. Macro and microstructural analysis showed no surface discontinuities. The changes in welding current and speed influenced the microstructure, which correlated with the hardness results.

Article Details

How to Cite
Taptimdee, W., Thammachot, N., Suwittayaruk, P., Chanchana, A., & Mayai, A. (2026). The Effect of Welding Current and Welding Speed on Hardness and Structure of Lap Joint Between SS400 Steel and SUS304 Stainless Steel in Robotic Gas Metal Arc Welding Process. Journal of Advanced Development in Engineering and Science, 15(44), 76–93. retrieved from https://ph03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pitjournal/article/view/3190
Section
Research Article

References

Nuraini, A. A., et al. (2014). The Effects of Welding Parameters on Butt Joints Using Robotic Gas Metal ARC Welding. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 6, 988–994.

Rout, A., et al. (2019). Advances in Weld Seam Tracking Techniques for Robotic Welding: A Review. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 56, 12–37.

Bandhu, D., et al. (2023). Influence of Regulated Metal Deposition and Gas Metal Arc Welding on ASTM A387-11–2 Steel Plates: As-Deposited Inspection, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 32(3), 1025–1038.

Ahmed, M. M. Z., et al. (2023). Friction Stir Welding of Aluminum in the Aerospace Industry: The Current Progress and State-of-the-Art Review. Materials, 16(8), 2971.

Maurya, A. K., et al. (2021). Dissimilar Welding of Duplex Stainless Steel with Ni Alloys: A Review. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 192, 104439.

Wiegand, M., et al. (2023). Dissimilar Micro Beam Welding of Titanium to Nitinol and Stainless Steel Using Biocompatible Filler Materials for Medical Applications. Welding in the World, 67(1), 77–88.

Brezinová, J., & Hašul, J. (2023). Evaluation of Fillet Welds Properties Performed by Cold Metal Transfer Robotic Metal Active Gas Welding Technology. Transport, 38(1), 44–51.

Ogbonna, O. S., et al. (2023). Grey-Based Taguchi Method for Multi-Weld Quality Optimization of Gas Metal Arc Dissimilar Joining of Mild Steel and 316 Stainless Steel. Results in Engineering, 17, 100963.

James, J. A., & Sudhish, R. (2016). Study on Effect of Interlayer in Friction Welding for Dissimilar Steels: SS 304 and AISI 1040. Procedia Technology, 25, 1191–1198.

Ratan Biswas, A., et al. (2018). Study of Parametric Effects on Mechanical Properties of Stainless Steel (AISI 304) and Medium Carbon Steel (45C8) Welded Joint Using GMAW. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(5), 12384–12393.

Purnama, D., & Oktadinata, H. (2019). Effect of Shielding Gas and Filler Metal to Microstructure of Dissimilar Welded Joint between Austenitic Stainless Steel and Low Carbon Steel. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 547, 012003.

Jahanzeb, N., et al. (2017). Effect of Microstructure on the Hardness Heterogeneity of Dissimilar Metal Joints between 316L Stainless Steel and SS400 Steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 700, 338–350.

Liu, J., et al. (2022). Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Active Gas Arc Welding between 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel and Q235B Low Carbon Steel. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 31(10), 8199–8209.

ASTM International. (2001). Standard Test Method for Apparent Shear Strength of Single-Lap-Joint Adhesively Bonded Metal Specimens by Tension Loading (Metal-to-Metal) (ASTM D1002-01).

Kumar, V., et al. (2021). Parametric Study and Characterization of Wire Arc Additive Manufactured Steel Structures. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 115, 1723–1733.

Pathak, D., et al. (2021). To Study the Influence of Process Parameters on Weld Bead Geometry in Shielded Metal Arc Welding. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44(1), 39–44.

Chaudhari, R., et al. (2022). Parametric Study and Investigations of Bead Geometries of GMAW-Based Wire–Arc Additive Manufacturing of 316L Stainless Steels. Metals, 12(7), 1232.

Vora, J., et al. (2022). Optimization of Bead Morphology for GMAW-Based Wire-Arc Additive Manufacturing of 2.25 Cr-1.0 Mo Steel Using Metal-Cored Wires. Applied Sciences, 12(10), 5060.

Nakhaei, R., et al. (2016). Effect of Active Gas on Weld Shape and Microstructure of Advanced A-TIG-Welded Stainless Steel. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 29(3), 295–300.

Khalifeh, A. R., et al. (2013). Dissimilar Joining of AISI 304L/St37 Steels by TIG Welding Process. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 26(6), 721–727.

Kimapong, K., & Triwanapong, S. (2018). Microstructure and Bending Strength of Dissimilar SS400/SUS304 Steels T-Fillet Joint by Gas Metal Arc Welding. Key Engineering Materials, 773, 189–195.