Comparison energy consumption for combined VSD pump with constant speed pump in raw water pumping

Authors

  • Wiwat Onnakklum Metropolitan Waterworks Authority

Keywords:

Energy management, Raw water pumping, Pump, Variable speed drive

Abstract

The raw water pumping system functions to pump raw water from the source into the production system by using pumps connected in parallel. The control of the pumping rate is achieved by adjusting the pump speed to increase or decrease the pumping rate. However, installing variable speed drive on every pump requires a high investment cost. Installing variable speed drive on only some pumps is therefore a cost-saving approach. In this experiment, pumps with adjustable speeds are operated together with pumps of fixed speed, and the optimal operating point for the raw water pumping system is determined to maximize energy savings at pumping rates of 8, 8.8, 9.6, and 10.4 . This is done by adjusting the speed of the variable-speed pumps in combination with 1, 2, and 3 constant-speed pumps.
The results show that at pumping rates of 8 and 8.8 , operating 4 variable-speed pumps yields the highest overall efficiency of 55.1 % and 55.3 %, respectively. At pumping rates of 9.6 and 10.4 , operating 2 variable-speed pumps together with constant-speed pumps yields the highest overall efficiency of 56.4 % and 53.4 %, respectively. In summary, operating an appropriate number of pumps according to the pumping rate, with pump speeds above 85 %, results in an overall efficiency greater than 53 %. When operating variable-speed pumps together with constant-speed pumps, only 1-2 constant-speed pumps should be used so that the remaining variable-speed pumps maintain speeds not lower than 85 %, thereby preserving high overall efficiency more than 50 %.

References

Sookkumnerd, C., Priprem, S., Hnunwong, A., Nadpoa, T. and Pholkor, P. (2008). Energy conservation of raw water pump at nampong power plant by using variable speed drive, paper presented in The 4th Conference on Energy Network of Thailand, Chonburi, Thailand.

Oshurbekov, S., Kazakbaev, V., Prakht, V., Dmitrievskii, V. and Gevorkov, L. (2020). Energy consumption comparison of a single variable-speed pump and a system of two pumps: variable-speed and fixed speed, Applied Sciences, vol. 10(24), pp. 8820.

Jilani, A. and Razali, A. (2018). Variable speed pump performance characteristics for domestic application, paper presented in MTEC Web of Conferences 225, Pahang, Malaysia.

Pipathattakul, M. and Thadniam, V. (2011). Effect of rotational speed on pump performance, Pathumwan Academic Journal, vol. 1(1), pp. 59-64.

Kalaiselvan, A.S.V., Subramaniam, U., Shanmugam, P. and Hanigovszki, N. (2016). A comprehensive review on energy efficiency enhancement initiatives in centrifugal pumping station, Applied Energy, vol. 181, pp. 495-513.

DeBenedictis, A., Haley, B., Woo, C.K. and Cutter, E. (2013). Operational energy-efficiency improvement of municipal water pumping in California, Energy, vol. 53, pp. 237-243.

Meetara, T. (2013). Study on energy management system for water supply generating system: case study of provincial waterworks authority Lopburi (Master dissertation). King Mongkut University of Technology Thonburi.

Thai Industrial Standards Institute. (2017). Rotating electrical machines – Part 30-1: Efficiency classes of line operated AC motors (IE code). Thai Industrial Standards Institute.

Pooley, E.I.J. (2022). Variable speed drives, Energy in building & industry, pp. 17-20.

Nugroho, D.O.W., Soehartanto, T. and Wibiwo, T.A. (2020). Performance of water pump on distribution and trans-mission process using variable speed drive, IPTEK Journal of Engineering, vol. 6(2), 2013, pp. 22-27.

Bogarrasa, K. (2022). The effect of rotational speed variation on the performance in the centrifugal pump, Journal of Research and Applications in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 10(1), pp. 1-7.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-26

How to Cite

Onnakklum, Wiwat. 2025. “Comparison energy consumption for combined VSD pump with constant speed pump in raw water pumping”. Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research 3 (2). Khon Kaen, Thailand:25-35. https://ph03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JEIRKKC/article/view/4271.