Designing Tractor Parts Inspection Equipment Using Quality Function Deployment Techniques Combined with Techniques for Order Preferenceby Similarity to Ideal Solution Method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The decision-making process in designing inspection equipment for tractor parts is a complex problem due to the various alternative and interrelated factors that need to be considered together. Therefore, this research presents the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) technique in conjunction with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to plan the product and design. It begins with listening to the requirements of the target group and analyzing QFD technique data. Then, the TOPSIS technique is used for the evaluation and ranking of importance. The test results revealed that in Phase 1: Product Planning, which has 13 alternatives (A1 to A13), alternative A8 is the best, with ccwi = 0.800, followed by alternative A10 (ccwi = 0.756) and A11 (ccwi = 0.700). In Phase 2: Design, which has 5 alternatives (A1 to A5), alternative A2 is the best, with ccwi = 0.800, followed by alternative A4 (ccwi = 0.772) and A5 (ccwi = 0.729). The result of the evaluation found that the average satisfaction score increased from 4.21 to 4.34, which is a percentage increase of 3.09.Therefore, this research can serve as a guideline for evaluating and prioritizing the importance of product planning and designing inspection equipment for other parts.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The content and information in articles published in the Journal of Advanced Development in Engineering and Science are the opinions and responsibility of the article's author. The journal editors do not need to agree or share any responsibility.
Articles, information, content, etc. that are published in the Journal of Advanced Development in Engineering and Science are copyrighted by the Journal of Advanced Development in Engineering and Science. If any person or organization wishes to publish all or any part of it or to do anything. Only prior written permission from the Journal of Advanced Development in Engineering and Science is required.
References
Kasikorn Research Center. (2023). Farm Machinery in 2022. Available from https://www.ryt9.com/s/prg/3288920?cv=1. Accessed date: 10 March 2023. (in Thai)
Thanatumrongkul, K. & Srinaruewan, P. (2023). Factors Affecting the Marketing Mix in Purchase of Agricultural Machinery in Chiang Mai. Payap University Journal, 33(1), 18-34.(in Thai)
Rawangwong, S., et al. (2022). Products Design of Bamboo Sofa Set Using Quality Function Deployment Technique with Kansei Engineering. Ladkrabang Engineering Journal, 39(3), 11-28. (in Thai)
Saravisutra, A. (2016). Multi-criteria Decition Making: Comparison Between SAW, AHP, TOPSIS Concept and Methods. Princess of Naradhiwas University Journal, 8(2), 180-192. (in Thai)
Deetae, N., et al. (2022). Risk Assessment of Farmers for Growing Safe Rice by The Fuzzy Technique of Order Preference Similarity to the Ideal Solution. Huachiew Chalermprakiet Science and Technology Journal, 8(1), 81-91. (in Thai)
Akao, Y., & Mazur, G. H. (2003). The Leading Edge in QFD: Past, Present and Future. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(1), 20-35.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234-281.
Chang, S. H., & Tseng, H. E. (2008). Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision Method for Configuration Management. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 15(3), 304-313.
Zandi, F., & Tavana, M. (2011). A Fuzzy Group Quality Function Deployment Model for e-CRM Framework Assessment in Agile Manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(1), 1-19.
Wichapa, N., & Warorot, W. (2023). A Hybrid Approach for Ranking Decision-Making Units with Fuzzy Variables. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 22(2), 97-108.
To-On, P., et al. (2023). A Novel TOPSIS Linear Programming Model Based on Response Surface Methodology for Determining Optimal Mixture Proportions of Lightweight Concrete Blocks Containing Sugarcane Bagasse Ash. Heliyon, 9(7). e17755.
Nasawat, P., et al. (2021). Hybrid Cross-Efficiency Approach Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points and the Critic Method for Ranking Decision-Making Units: A Case Study on Ranking the Methods of Rice Weevil Disinfestation. Decision Science Letters, 10(3), 375-392.
Kumaraswamy, A., et al. (2011). An Integrated QFD-TOPSIS Methodology for Supplier Selection in SMEs. In 2011 Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling & Simulation (pp. 271-276). 20 – 22 September, 2011, Langkawi, Malaysia.
Li, M., et al. (2014). A new MCDM Method Combining QFD with TOPSIS for Knowledge Management System Selection from the User's Perspective in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 28-37.
Karimi, B. H., et al. (2012). Applying A Hybrid QFD-TOPSIS Method to Design Product in the Industry (Case Study in Sum Service Company). Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(18), 3283-3288.
Rahpeyma, B., & Zarei, M. (2018). An Integrated QFD-TOPSIS Approach for Supplier Selection Under Fuzzy Environment: A Case of Detergent Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 9(3), 62-81.
Pandey, V., et al. (2023). A Review on TOPSIS Method and Its Extensions for Different Applications with Recent Development. Soft Computing, 27(23), 18011-18039.
Sampath, B., et al. (2023). Application of TOPSIS Optimization Technique in the Micro-Machining Process. In Mellal, M. A. (Ed.). Trends, paradigms, and advances in mechatronics engineering. (p. 162 - 187). Minneapolis, New York: IGI Global.
Lu, H., et al. (2022). Selection of Agricultural Machinery Based on Improved CRITIC-Entropy Weight and GRA-TOPSIS Method. Processes, 10(2), 266.
Gheibollahi, H., & Masih-Tehrani, M. (2023). A Multi-Objective Optimization Method Based on NSGA-II Algorithm and Entropy Weighted TOPSIS for Fuzzy Active Seat Suspension of Articulated Truck Semi-Trailer. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 237(17), 3809-3826.
Mohammadi, A., & Darestani, S. A. (2019). Green Supplier Selection Problem Using TOPSIS Extended by D Numbers in Tractor Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 32(3), 327-338.
Chakraborty, S. (2022). TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A Comparative Analysis. Decision Analytics Journal, 2, 100021.
Çelikbilek, Y., & Tüysüz, F. (2020). An In-Depth Review of Theory of the TOPSIS Method: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Management Analytics, 7(2), 281-300.
Wang, Y., et al. (2022). BMW-TOPSIS: A Generalized TOPSIS Model Based on Three-Way Decision. Information Sciences, 607, 799-818.
Aires, R. F. de F., & Ferreira, L. (2019). A new approach to avoid rank reversal cases in the TOPSIS method. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 132, 84-97.
Wichapa, N., et al. (2019). Using the Hybrid DEA-TOPSIS Technique for Selecting the Suitable Biomass Materials for Processing into Fuel Briquettes. The Journal of Industrial Technology, 15(1), 63-80. (in Thai)
Sechok, T., et al. (2017). Design and Develop Tool Holder for Turning Using Quality Function Deployment. Journal of industrial technology Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, 7(2), 117-131. (in Thai)
