Analysis of Factors Affecting the Grinding Performance of a Solar-Powered Charcoal Grinder

Main Article Content

Worapong Phongphattarawut
Teeraphat Yueangklang
Pichaipusit Kaewthong
Naphatara Intanon

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the performance and determine the optimal operating conditions of a solar-powered charcoal grinder. The grinder used in this study was a hammer mill powered by a 750-W DC motor operating at a rotational speed of 1,000 rpm and equipped with a sieve having an aperture size of less than 450 µm. The experimental factors consisted of two charcoal feed quantities (1 and 2 kg) and three grinding times (5, 6, and 10 min). Each treatment combination was replicated four times. The performance of the grinder was evaluated based on the percentage yield of charcoal powder, whereas the optimal operating condition was determined by the lowest operating cost. The results showed that the grinder produced a higher charcoal powder yield when processing 1 kg of charcoal per batch than when processing 2 kg per batch at all grinding times. Statistical analysis indicated that both charcoal feed quantity and grinding time significantly affected the charcoal powder yield at the 0.05 significance level. The highest grinding efficiency reached 99.53%. Economic analysis revealed that the optimal operating condition was a feed quantity of 2 kg and a grinding time of 6 min per batch. Under this condition, the production cost was reduced to 17.81 THB/kg of charcoal powder.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Phongphattarawut W, Yueangklang T, Kaewthong P, Intanon N. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Grinding Performance of a Solar-Powered Charcoal Grinder. J. Techno. Eng. Prog. [internet]. 2026 Jun. 29 [cited 2026 Sep. 8];4(1):15-23. available from: https://ph03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTEP/article/view/4915
Section
Research article

References

Demirbas A. Bioenergy: Biomass to Biofuels. London: Springer; 2009.

Rosillo-Calle F, de Groot P, Hemstock SL, Woods J. The Biomass Assessment Handbook. London: Earthscan; 2007.

Sotannde OO, Oluyege MO, Abah SO. Physical and combustion properties of charcoal briquettes from neem wood residues. Int Agrophys. 2010;24(2):189–194.

Sevilla M, Fuertes AB. The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Carbon. 2009;47(9):2281–2289.

Kaliyan D, Morey RV. Factors affecting strength and durability of densified biomass products. Biomass Bioenergy. 2009;33(3):337–359.

Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S. Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy. 2004;27(4):339–352.

Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE). Thailand Alternative Energy Report 2023. Bangkok: Ministry of Energy; 2023. (in Thai)

Hossain MA, Rahim NA, Selvaraj J, Pandey AK. Recent progress and development on power DC–DC converter topology, control, design and applications: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;81:205–230.

Rungrattanaubon K, Srisukho P, Chuen-atsadongkot T, Loetkhamphu N, Angkhahiran W. Design and construction of a mussel shell grinding machine for shell-clay production in community enterprises. Journal of Industrial Technology Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University. 2024;12(2). (in Thai)

Meemon A, Pramunmak S, Jai-u J. Influence of agricultural residue particle size on biomass fuel pellet formation. Research Report under the Community Enterprise and Small and Medium Enterprise Research Program. Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand; 2015. (in Thai)

Surin P, Kantha C, Mawilet W, Khanthakhiao Y, Jaikhampan M. Development of a bamboo shoot waste grinding machine. Journal of Vocational Education Research and Innovation. 2022;6(2). (in Thai)

Zhang Y, Wang L, Li H, Chen X. Effect of particle size reduction on biomass densification and fuel properties: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022;158:112113.

Miao Z, Grift TE, Hansen AC, Ting KC. Energy consumption and particle size distribution in biomass grinding operations: Recent advances and future perspectives. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2021;149:106102

Olatunji OO, Akinlabi ET, Madushele N. Design considerations and performance evaluation of hammer mills for biomass processing: A review. Sustainability. 2023;15(8):6872.