Community-Based Tourism, Livelihood Transformation, and Rural Sustainability: A Sustainable Livelihood Framework Analysis of Mae Kampong, Thailand

Main Article Content

Hong Wei
Orathai Klaitarong

บทคัดย่อ

Community-based tourism (CBT) has been increasingly promoted as an approach to supporting sustainable rural development through livelihood diversification, community participation, and the utilization of local resources. However, much of the existing literature remains focused primarily on economic outcomes and tourism performance indicators, while paying comparatively limited attention to the structural processes through which tourism reshapes household livelihoods and influences long-term rural sustainability. This study examines these relationships through a case study of Mae Kampong. Drawing on the Sustainable Livelihood Framework and the concept of community capital transformation, it conceptualizes CBT as a process that reorganizes natural, economic, social, cultural, and human capital, and connects these transformations to changes in household livelihood strategies and rural sustainability outcomes. The study adopts a qualitative documentary approach based on an analysis of academic literature, previous studies, policy documents, and secondary sources relating to CBT and Mae Kampong. The findings indicate that CBT has substantially transformed household livelihood systems within the community. Tourism-related activities—including homestay services, local guiding, food and beverage businesses, and the sale of local products—contributed to livelihood diversification and reduced exclusive dependence on agriculture and forest-based livelihoods. The integration of tourism into household economies enhanced livelihood flexibility and strengthened adaptive capacity in response to economic and environmental uncertainty. However, the findings also reveal that tourism benefits are distributed unevenly among households, with greater advantages concentrated among those possessing stronger economic resources, favorable locations, and better access to tourism-related opportunities. These inequalities create structural tensions that challenge the community's long-term sustainability. The study further demonstrates that tourism generates multidimensional impacts on community capital. Tourism has strengthened local economic activities and reinforced certain forms of social capital through participatory management structures and collective governance mechanisms. At the same time, it has contributed to cultural commodification pressures, social differentiation, and increasing environmental stress on fragile mountain ecosystems due to growing tourist numbers and resource-use intensity. The findings suggest that CBT functions simultaneously as both a supporting force and a structural challenge for rural sustainability. Sustainable outcomes do not emerge automatically from tourism development alone; rather, they depend on effective local governance, equitable benefit distribution, community participation, adaptive capacity, and the long-term management of relationships among the economic, social, cultural, and environmental dimensions of rural development.

Article Details

ประเภทบทความ
บทความวิจัย

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Atchara, S. (2016). The development of self-learning models to enhance business performance of community-based tourism enterprises in Northern Thailand [Master’s thesis, Naresuan University].

Bunyavipakul, M. (2011). Sustainable community development project: A case study of Mae Kampong Village [Master’s thesis, Rangsit University].

Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (IDS Discussion Paper No. 296). Institute of Development Studies.

Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371–386.

Department for International Development. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. Department for International Development.

Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.

Giampiccoli, A., & Mtapuri, O. (2012). Community-based tourism: An exploration of the concept(s). African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance, 18(Suppl. 2), 34–46.

Jittima, K. (2018). Collaboration between government and community in homestay management of Mae Kampong Village, Mae On District, Chiang Mai Province. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 13(2), 29–42.

MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603.

Natthida, K. (2021). The success of community-based tourism management: A case study of Ban Rai Kong King and Mae Kampong communities, Chiang Mai Province. Chiang Mai University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 81–97.

Orapan, C. (2019). Cultural landscape management through community resilience: A case study of Mae Kampong Village, Chiang Mai Province [Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University].

Prapatsorn, S. (2014). A study of Thai tourists’ attitudes towards Mae Kampong homestay, Mae On District, Chiang Mai Province [Master’s thesis, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University].

Scheyvens, R. (1999). Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tourism Management, 20(2), 245–249.

Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis (IDS Working Paper No. 72). Institute of Development Studies.

Siriporn, P. (2019). Success factors of community-based tourism development: A case study of Ban Na Ton Chan, Sukhothai Province [Master’s thesis, Naresuan University].

Suansri, P. (2003). Community-based tourism handbook. Responsible Ecological Social Tours Project (REST).

Suntikul, W., & Dorji, U. (2016). Tourism and community development in Bhutan: From theory to practice. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(6), 554–571.

Supattra, M. (2017). Success factors in community participation processes of model communities for sustainable community-based tourism management: A case study of Nam Chiao Sub-district, Trat Province. Thammasat Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 14(2), 88–104.

Thammasat University. (2018). Exploring approaches for community economic development through community-based tourism: Mae Kampong Village, Mae On District, Chiang Mai Province (Research report).

Thammasat University. (2019). Community-based tourism management based on the sufficiency economy philosophy under dynamic change: Mae Kampong Village, Huai Kaeo Subdistrict, Mae On District, Chiang Mai Province (Research report).

Tosun, C. (2000). Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries. Tourism Management, 21(6), 613–633.

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.

Yodsuwan, S. (2022). The image of Mae Kampong eco-tourism village and its impact on tourists’ satisfaction and revisit intention (Research report). National Research Council of Thailand.

Zapata, M. J., Hall, C. M., Lindo, P., & Vanderschaeghe, M. (2011). Can community-based tourism contribute to development and poverty alleviation? Lessons from Nicaragua. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(8), 725–749.