Flood hazard mitigation using managed aquifer recharge: Numerical assessment of a pilot trial in the Nam Kam River Basin, NE Thailand

Authors

  • Jirapat Phetheet Department of Groundwater Resources, Thailand
  • Ocpasorn Occarach Department of Groundwater Resources, Thailand
  • Kriangsak Pirarai Department of Groundwater Resources, Thailand

Keywords:

Flood mitigation, Managed aquifer recharge, Groundwater model

Abstract

Flash flooding is one of the most catastrophic natural hazards. These disastrous events may trigger some rainfall-related geohazards, e.g., landslides and slumps. Sakon Nakhon Province, partly located in the Nam Kam River Basin, has been severely damaged by storm-driven floods. Due to the effect of climate change, precipitation has changed in intensity, pattern, and frequency. In 2017, this area was hit by a tropical cyclone causing heavy rainfall and considerable flash flooding. Consequently, residential properties, agricultural areas, and infrastructure facilities were devastated. The storm eventually caused 3-million-dollar worth of damage in the province.

The challenge for policymakers is to develop strategies that can provide long-term solutions to reduce extensive damage caused by the hazards. This study drew on examples of the use of managed aquifer recharge (MAR) as an approach primarily to prevent flood-related issues and store stormwater runoff. The MAR system comprises settling and infiltration ponds constructed in an area of 8,000 m2 . A modeling approach is widely known as a scientific and reliable method for the assessment of MAR systems. Therefore, a groundwater model was developed to simulate MAR and the subsequent movement of groundwater. The MAR model was constructed using a notable 3D groundwater-flow model known as MODFLOW-NWT, in association with a MODPATH particle-tracking model. The model accounted for interactions between artificial lakes (Lak Package) and groundwater. Two model scenarios were developed based on the actual MAR methods applied at the demonstration site: (1) An infiltration pond scenario and (2) an infiltration pond with four recharge wells scenario.

The results revealed that the flow model had an acceptable accuracy with an NRMSE of 8.98%. The annual rate of pond seepage was 90,052 m3 . Additionally, artificially recharged water simulated by virtual particles could travel in the system for at least ten years, with a maximum travel distance of 698.07 meters (0.19 meters/day). In addition to recharge ponds, the runoff was recharged directly into the aquifer via the recharge wells. An annual recharge rate is about 22,600 m3 . The deeper-and-longer flow paths were roughly doubled in the distance compared to the first scenario, being up to 1,683.16 meters away from recharge wells with an average rate of 0.46 meters/day. In conclusion, the MAR system is a practical solution to capture runoff, mitigate downstream flooding, and enhance groundwater storage for sustainable water management. Most importantly, the system may provide indirect solutions for preventing geohazards within the context of river floods, landslides, and slumps.

References

Charuvastra, T. (2017, July 28). ‘Sonca Storm’ Floods Sink Northeastern Towns. Khaosod English. https://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/crimecourts calamity/2017/07/28/sonca-storm-floods-sink-north eastern-towns

DGR. (2020). Analysis of Suitable areas for Managed Aquifer Recharge in the Nam Kam River Basin(translated title). Department of Groundwater Resources.

DGR. (2022). Evaluating Managed Aquifer Recharge through Infiltration Ponds: A Pilot Study in the Nam Kam River Basin (translated title). Department of Groundwater Resources. http://elibrary.dgr.go.th/ebook all/detail/96192

El-Zehairy, A. A., Lubczynski, M. W., & Gurwin, J. (2018). Interactions of artificial lakes with groundwater applying an integrated MODFLOW solution. Hydrogeology Journal, 26(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1641-x

Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S., Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., Hoell, A., & Michaelsen, J. (2015). The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—A new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Scientific Data, 2(1), 150066. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66

GISTDA. (2017). Flood map 2017 [Shapefile]. Thailand Flood Monitoring System. Retrieved from https://flood.gistda.or.th/flood/y2017/FL50_analysis/flood_2017_geo.zip.

GISTDA. (2020). Flood map 2020 [Shapefile]. Thailand Flood Monitoring System. Retrieved from https://flood.gistda.or.th/flood/y2020/FL50_analysis/flood_y2020.zip.

Harbaugh, A. W. (2005). MODFLOW-2005: The U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model—The ground-water flow process (Report No. 6-A16; Techniques and Methods). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A16

IPCC (2022), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press.

Kisner, C. (2008, July). Climate Change Case Study: Thailand. Climate Institute. https://climate.org/ archive/topics/international action/thailand.htm

Mehl, S., Hill, M., & Leake, S. (2006). Comparison of local grid refinement methods for MODFLOW. Ground Water, 44, 792–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6 584.2006.00192.x

Merritt, M. L., & Konikow, L. F. (2000). Documentation of a computer program to simulate lake-aquifer interaction using the MODFLOW ground water flow model and the MOC3D solute-transport model (Report No. 2000–4167; Water-Resources Investigations Report). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/wri004167

Niswonger, R. G., Panday, S., & Ibaraki, M. (2011). MODFLOW-NWT, A Newton formulation for MODFLOW-2005 (Report No. 6-A37; Techniques and Methods). USGS Publications Warehouse. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A37

Phetheet, J., Hill, M. C., Barron, R. W., Rossi, M. W., Amanor-Boadu, V., Wu, H., & Kisekka, I. (2020). Consequences of climate change on food-energywater systems in arid regions without agricultural adaptation, analyzed using FEWCalc and DSSAT. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 105309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105309

Pollock, D. W. (2016). User guide for MODPATH Version 7—A particle-tracking model for MODFLOW (Report No. 2016–1086; Open-File Report, p. 41). USGS Publications Warehouse.https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20161086

Tabari, H. (2020). Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 13768. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70816-2

Downloads

Published

2024-06-18

How to Cite

Phetheet, J. ., Occarach, O., & Pirarai, . K. . (2024). Flood hazard mitigation using managed aquifer recharge: Numerical assessment of a pilot trial in the Nam Kam River Basin, NE Thailand . Thai Geoscience Journal, 5(7), 41–50. Retrieved from https://ph03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TGJ/article/view/3010

Issue

Section

Research article

Categories