Evaluation of Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in paediatric body imaging using 320-detector CT

Authors

  • Saifhon Admontree Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Center (AIMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Sawitree Junsorn Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Center (AIMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Rattanaporn Tathip Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Center (AIMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Supannika Todsatidpaisan Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Center (AIMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Pranee Buachan Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Center (AIMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
  • Sawwanee Asavaphatiboon Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Center (AIMC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/nujst.2019.14

Keywords:

320-detector CT, size-specific dose estimates (SSDE), volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), paediatric CT, diagnostic reference levels (DRLs)

Abstract

     The radiation dose from CT is considered a high risk measure in diagnostic radiology. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Report No. 204 has concerned the CT dose which depends on the patient size especially in the paediatric patients. We therefore used the conversion factor in AAPM 204 to evaluate size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) of the volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) for paediatric body CT imaging with 320 slice CT which is used for routinely in paediatric cases at Ramathibodi Hospital. Purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare SSDEs to displayed CT scanner output in paediatric chest and abdomen examinations acquired on 320-detector CT. Quality control was performed prior to data collection. A retrospective analysis categorized 525 paediatric CT examinations (224 chest, 92 abdomen, and 209 chest including abdomen) into four age groups. SSDE conversion factors were used as a function of effective diameter for 32-cm-diameter PMMA phantom to estimate the patient dose, based on scanner output index (displayed CTDIvol) and patient sizes. Results showed that the highest percentage difference between the displayed and SSDE CTDIvol was found in the youngest age group (0-<1 year old). In conclusion, we found that size-specific dose estimation for CT results in dose estimates different to those displayed on the CT scanner, especially in a small-sized paediatric population. The percentage differences of size-specific dose estimation CTDIvol values from displayed values in each age group for chest, abdomen and chest including abdomen CT were 133/117/85/103, 124/100/83/65 and 112/105/91/68, respectively. Radiologists should be concerned about these differences, and diagnostic technologists should estimate the SSDE dose and adjust scanning parameters appropriately before performing the CT scan. To ensure that radiation dose does not exceed diagnostic reference levels.

References

American Association of Physicists in Medicine. (2011). Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in paediatric and adult body CT examination. Report of AAPM Task Group 204 Retrieved from https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_204.pdf

Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency. (2013). Australian national paediatric diagnostic reference levels for MDCT. Retrieved from https://www.arpansa.gov.au/research/surveys/national-diagnostic-reference-level-service/current-diagnostic-reference-levels/paediatric

Brady, S. L., & Kaufman, R. A. (2012). Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine report 204 size-specific dose estimates for paediatric CT implementation. Radiology, 265, 832-840.

Christner, J. A., Braun, N. N., Jacobsen, M. C., Carter, R. E., Kofler, J. M., & McCollough, C. H. (2012). Size-specific Dose Estimates for Adult Patients at CT of the Torso. Radiology, 265, 841-847.

European Commission. (2016). European guidelines on DRLs for imaging. Retrieved from http://www. eurosafeimaging.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/European-Guidelines-on-paediatric DRLs-for-Paediatric-Imaging_Revised_18-July-2016_clean.pdf

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2012). Quality assurance programme for Computed Tomography: Diagnostic and therapy application. Retrieved from http://www.iaea.org/books

Khawaja, R. D., Singh, S., Vettiyil, B., Lim, R., Gee, M., Westra, S., & Kalra, M. K. (2015). Simplifying size-specific radiation dose estimates in pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 204(1), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.12191

Kritsaneepaiboon, S., Trinavarat, P., & Visrutaratna, P. (2012). Survey of pediatric MDCT radiation dose from university hospitals in Thailand: a preliminary for national dose survey. Acta Radiologica, 53(7), 820-826. https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2012.110641

Shrimpton, P. (2004). European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography. Retrieved from https:// publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d229c9e1-a967-49de-b169-59ee6860 5f1a

Tsujiguchi, T., Obara, H., Ono, S., Saito, Y., & Kashiwakura, I. (2018). Consideration of the usefulness of a size-specific dose estimate in pediatric CT examination. Journal of Radiation Research, 59(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry022

Downloads

Published

2019-05-28

Issue

Section

Research Articles