A Journal Article Selection based on a Combination of Scanning and Skimming Techniques

Authors

  • Nantapong Keandoungchun School of Applied Statistics, National Institute Development of Administration, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Nithinant Thammakoranonta School of Applied Statistics, National Institute Development of Administration, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/nujst.2022.3

Keywords:

Journal Article Selection, Topic Modeling, Scanning, Skimming

Abstract

        Typically, an academic writing style of journals is complicated because those journals use complex vocabularies and complex sentences. It might be hard for students to read documents in detail in short period of time. Therefore, this research proposes a Journal Article Selection (JAS) based on a combination of scanning and skimming techniques to reduce number of documents sufficient to support unskilled readers. JAS is developed by python on Google Colaboratory (Bisong, 2019). The designed JAS is assessed in three aspects which are the optimal number of topics and subtopics by considering the coherence value and the relevant terms within topic, the correctness of model and the percentage of the document reduction. The experimental results revealed that there are three layers of topic model: Medical, Business Law and Computer are in layer 1, Social Network and Information System are in layer 2, and Process Model, General Problem and Artificial Intelligence are in layer 3. On other aspects, the proposed model is achieved in 77.36 average percentage of F-measure and 94.15 average percentage of unnecessary document reduction. In conclusion, it can be concluded that JAS can reduce documents sufficient for readers to read in short period of time.

References

Bisong, E. (2019). Google Colaboratory. In: Building Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models on Google Cloud Platform. Berkeley. CA: Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4470-8_7

Cahyono, B. Y. (1997). Effectiveness of Journal Writing in Supporting Skills in Writing English Essay. The Journal of Education, 4, 310-318.

Dobbin, K. K., & Simon, R. M. (2011). Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers. BMC Medical Genomics, 4(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-4-31

Ide, N., & Véronis, J. (1998). Introduction to the Special Issue on Word Sense Disambiguation: The State of the Art. Computational Linguistics, 24(1), 1-40.

Ismail, H., Syahruzah, J. K., & Basuki. (2017). Improving the Students’ Reading Skill through Translation Method. Journal of English Education, 2, 124-131.

Navigli, R. (2009). Word Sense Disambiguation: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(2), 10:11-10:69. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1459352.1459355

Sittirak, N., & Pornjamroen, S. (2009). The Survey of British English and American English Vocabulary Usage of Thai Students. Songklanakarin Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 15(4), 559-575.

Tenopir, C., Mays, R., & Wu, L. (2011). Journal Article Growth and Reading Patterns. New Review of Information Networking, 16(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2011.566796

Usman, M., Bajwa, Z., & Afzal, M. (2014). Performance Analysis of Searching Algorithms in C#. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 2(XII), 511-513.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28

Issue

Section

Research Articles